Ask questions which are clear, concise and easy to understand.
Ask QuestionPosted by Mohd Waseem Arzoo 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Prashanta Sutradhar 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Gourav Lakhani 5 years, 6 months ago
- 2 answers
Yogita Ingle 5 years, 6 months ago
The replacement model asserts that there was a single origin of Homo sapiens in Africa and that these anatomically modern humans migrated out from Africa and replaced all other lesser-evolved humans throughout Europe and Asia.
Posted by Krishna Roy 5 years, 6 months ago
- 2 answers
Komal Chhillar 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Vinay Sharma 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Sanmari Debbarma 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Vikram Rathore 5 years, 6 months ago
- 2 answers
Gourav Lakhani 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Karan Nanjar 5 years, 6 months ago
- 2 answers
Komal Chhillar 5 years, 6 months ago
Yogita Ingle 5 years, 6 months ago
Some advantages of the Industrial Revolution are that it enabled production of goods on a scale that was unprecedented in human history, that it elevated many people's standard of living, and that it expanded the economies of many nations.
Posted by Shaina Shetty 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Lolo Debbarma 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 5 years, 6 months ago
In the USA, as settlement expanded, the natives were induced or forced to move, after signing treaties selling their land. The prices paid were very low, and there were instances when the Americans (a term used to mean the European people of the USA) cheated them by taking more land or paying less than promised.
Even high officials saw nothing wrong in depriving the native peoples of their land. This is seen by an episode in Georgia, a state in the USA. Officials had argued that the Cherokee tribe was governed by state laws, but could not enjoy the rights of citizens. (This was despite the fact that, of all the native peoples, the Cherokees were the ones who had made the most effort to learn English and to understand the American way of life; even so they were not allowed the rights of citizens.)
Posted by Karun Bhatia 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Alpesh Bariya 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Anurag Dixit 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Komal Chhillar 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Rishabh Rishabh 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Rishabh Rishabh 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Komal Chhillar 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Rishabh Rishabh 5 years, 6 months ago
- 2 answers
Yash Tiwari 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Chetna Saini 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Rishabh Rishabh 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Litsong Kathar 5 years, 6 months ago
- 2 answers
Yogita Ingle 5 years, 6 months ago
Cuneiform Script is a script of Mesopotamia. The word ‘Cuneiform’ is derived from the Latin words cuneus, meaning ‘wedge’ and forma, meaning ‘shape’. Cuneiform letters were wedge shaped, hence, like nails.
Kritika Singh 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Ankitkumar Singh 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Ankitkumar Singh 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Ankitkumar Singh 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Kritika Singh 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Jai Baisoya 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Komal Chhillar 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Garima Chauhan 5 years, 6 months ago
- 1 answers
Ankitkumar Singh 5 years, 6 months ago
Posted by Phethangam Graal 4 years, 3 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 4 years, 3 months ago
Roman Slaves: Slavery was an institution deeply rooted in the ancient world, both in the Mediterranean and in the Near East, and not even Christianity when it emerged and triumphed as the state religion (in the fourth century) seriously challenged this institution. It does not follow that the bulk of the labour in the Roman economy was performed by slaves.
That may have been true of large parts of Itlay in the Republican period (under Augustus there were still 3 million slaves in a total Italian population of 7.5 million) but it was no longer true of the empire as a whole.
Slaves were an investment, and at least one Roman agricultural writer advised landowners against using them in contexts where too many might be required (for example, for harvests) or where their health could be damaged (for example, by malaria).
These considerations were not based on any sympathy for the slaves but on hard economic calculation. On the other hand, if the Roman upper classes were often brutal towards their slaves, ordinary people did sometimes show much more compassion.
French Serfs: Serfs cultivated plots of land, but these belonged to the lord. Much of the produce from this had to be given to the lord. They also had to work on the land which belonged exclusively to the lord. They received no wages and could not leave the estate without the lord’s permission.
The lord claimed a number of monopolies at the expense of his serfs. Serfs could use only their lord’s mill to grind their flour, his oven to bake their bread, and his winepresses to distil wine and beer.
The lord could decide whom a serf should marry, or might give his blessing to the serf’s choice but on payment of a fee.
Posted by Manvi Goyal 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Jatin Obroi 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Antonio George 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Kâ Hi 5 years, 6 months ago
- 0 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Rituraj Singh Bhati 5 years, 6 months ago
2Thank You