Discuss whether kings in early States …
CBSE, JEE, NEET, CUET
Question Bank, Mock Tests, Exam Papers
NCERT Solutions, Sample Papers, Notes, Videos
Posted by Oben Pullom 4 years, 1 month ago
- 1 answers
Related Questions
Posted by Malini Debbarma 4 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Random User 4 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Random User 4 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Account Deleted 4 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Rajdeep Kaur 4 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Monika Parajuli 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Divyaraj Rathore 1234 4 months, 4 weeks ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Anmoldeep Kaur Sran 4 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Gaurav Seth 4 years, 1 month ago
• Kings in early states were not invariably Kshatriyas.
• Several important ruling lineages had different origins.
• For example, according to later Buddhist texts, social background of the Mauryas was Kshatriya, but Brahmanical texts described them as being of "low" origin. They established a mighty empire.
• Shakas were regarded as mlechchhas (barbarians or outsiders) by the Brahmanas. However, Rudradaman, the best-known Shaka ruler, was a powerful ruler.
• Powerful mlechchhas who were familiar with Sanskritic traditions could become rulers.
• Ruler of the Satavahana dynasty, Gotami-puta Siri Satakani claimed to be both a Brahmana and a Kshatriya.
1Thank You