Disscuss the administration of delhi sultanate
CBSE, JEE, NEET, CUET
Question Bank, Mock Tests, Exam Papers
NCERT Solutions, Sample Papers, Notes, Videos
Posted by Parray Touseef 4 years, 3 months ago
- 1 answers
Related Questions
Posted by Minal Manoj 2 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Avni Agarwal 2 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Account Deleted 4 months, 3 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Aqsa Javed 4 months, 3 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Vundru Deepak 4 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Sukriti Sharma 4 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Harmanjot Kaur Dhillon Dhillon12 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Account Deleted 4 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Beena Joshi 4 months, 2 weeks ago
- 2 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Gaurav Seth 4 years, 3 months ago
Administration and consolidation by Khaljis and Tughluqs
Reliable governors and administrators were needed for the vast kingdom of the Delhi Sultanate. The early Delhi Sultans chose to employ special slaves (whom they had purchased for military service) as governors, instead of employing aristocrats and landed chieftains. Especially, Iltutmish employed the slaves as mentioned above. These slaves were called bandagan in Persian. They were trained well to man some of the important political offices of the kingdom and their total dependence on the master ensured their reliability and dependability.
People of humble birth were also raised to high political positions by the Tughluqs and Khaljis. These people were often their clients (i.e. someone who is under another person’s protection or is dependent on another person). These people were appointed as governors and generals. But this also led to some political instability creeping in.
The slaves and clients were very loyal to their masters and patron. But they were not loyal to their heirs.
New Sultans had their own servants and hence often there was conflict between the old and new nobility whenever there was an accession. The authors of the Persian tawarikh criticized the appointment of the ‘low and base-born’ to high offices.
0Thank You