Isn't that strange?did our constitution makers …
CBSE, JEE, NEET, CUET
Question Bank, Mock Tests, Exam Papers
NCERT Solutions, Sample Papers, Notes, Videos
Test
Related Questions
Posted by Chirag Jindal 1 year, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Armaan Ali 1 year, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Shristi Pandey 1 month, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Anisha Grover 3 months, 1 week ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Siddhanth Aravind 1 year, 1 month ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Kapil Dev Saroye 1 year, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Sudhanshu Choudhry 1 year, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Sai Sravika Godavarthi 3 months, 2 weeks ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Sakshi Patel 6 days, 2 hours ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Vansh Singh 1 year, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Gaurav Seth 5 years, 5 months ago
It is not strange. Our Constitution makers where aware of the concenpt of deralism. But, intentionally, they did not talk about it. This was because our democracy was passing through a nascent stage where they had to take steps to consolidate different free princely states. If they had been given more autonomy, we might have faced many divisions of our country. They supposed that with maturity of democracy, proper changes will be brought in the Constitution to make the nation more federal. So they left this issue to the people and future leaders to decide about.
0Thank You