How did British historians divided history
CBSE, JEE, NEET, CUET
Question Bank, Mock Tests, Exam Papers
NCERT Solutions, Sample Papers, Notes, Videos
Posted by Manju Bhuria 5 years, 1 month ago
- 1 answers
Related Questions
Posted by Harmanjot Kaur Dhillon Dhillon12 10 months, 2 weeks ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Sanskar Soundale 11 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Gurkirat Kaur 11 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Minal Manoj 8 months, 3 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Vundru Deepak 10 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Avni Agarwal 8 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Beena Joshi 10 months, 3 weeks ago
- 2 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Yogita Ingle 5 years, 1 month ago
Historians divide the past into large segmentsโperiodsโthat possess shared characteristics. In the middle of the nineteenth century British historians divided the history of India into three periods: "Hindu", "Muslim" and "British". This division was based on the idea that the religion of rulers was the only important historical change, and that there were no other significant developmentsโin the economy, society or culture. Few historians follow this periodisation today. Most look to economic and social factors to characterize the major elements of different moments of the past. Historians face many problems while dividing the past into periods. The reason is that there was a good amount of technological development in the medieval period which can be called modern in the contemporary context. Despite that the period is not called modem but medieval. On the other hand, the modern past is followed by the medieval past
0Thank You