"Development for the one may not …

Yes it is quite true that development for one may not be development fot the other. This statement can be understood from the following points:- [5 marks] (i) High wages mean development for a worker but it may go against the producer or entrepreneur and may not be development for him. (ii) A trader or a poor farmer wants to sell his produce at a high price rate but a common man wants to buy it at a lower price rate. (iii) Construction of dam means more and cheap power but it may displace the people who live in that land and snatch their habitat. (iv) The industrialists want more and more construction of dams to get cheap electricity but it may submerge the agricultural and ancestral lands of the people living there. (v) A milkman wants to sell his milk at a high rate but the people who use milk as their daily need will oppose him. Regards, RISHABH PARIDA

• Different people face different situations. •°• it's only natural that their needs, desires and aspirations will be different. • Different aspirations lead to differing notions of development. • Thus, what may be development for 1 person or group may not be so for another, it may even be conflicting to their notion of development. • For instance, for urban people construction of a dam is development as it would led to the fulfillment of their aspirations of better energy supply. However this is not development for the forest dwellers and aadivasis who will get displaced due to the submergence of their land due to the construction of the dam.

Yes becoz what may be development for one may nt be development for another, it may be destructive for the other, example book me dekh lijiyega???

Development for one may be destructive for other. It's not important that living status of every person is same. For example, development for a industrialist is to build large dams but this lead to problems for the tribal people who were displaced.

Ya