explain why some scholars see partition …
CBSE, JEE, NEET, CUET
Question Bank, Mock Tests, Exam Papers
NCERT Solutions, Sample Papers, Notes, Videos
Posted by Ten Cullen 5 years, 10 months ago
- 1 answers
Related Questions
Posted by Malini Debbarma 4 months, 3 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Anmoldeep Kaur Sran 4 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Random User 4 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Monika Parajuli 4 months, 1 week ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Account Deleted 4 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Random User 4 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Rajdeep Kaur 4 months, 2 weeks ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Divyaraj Rathore 1234 5 months ago
- 1 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Yogita Ingle 5 years, 10 months ago
Some scholars see Partition as a culmination of a communal politics that started developing in the opening decades of the twentieth century.
(i) They suggest that separate electorates for Muslims, created by the colonial government in 1909 and expanded in 1919, crucially shaped the nature of communal politics.
(ii) This created a temptation for politicians working within this system to use sectarian slogans and gather a following by distributing favours to their own religious groups.
(iii) Religious identities thus acquired a functional use within a modern political system; and the logic of electoral politics deepened and hardened these identities. Community identities no longer indicated simple difference in faith and belief; they came to mean active opposition and hostility between communities.
(iv) During the 1920s and early 1930s tension grew around a number of issues. Muslims were angered by “music-before-mosque”, by the cow protection movement, and by the efforts of the Arya Samaj to bring back to the Hindu fold (shuddhi) those who had recently converted to Islam.
0Thank You