Ask questions which are clear, concise and easy to understand.
Ask QuestionPosted by Vinod Mishra 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Jay,Shiv Agrawal 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Rytham Kapoor 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Reenu Kumari Reenu Khatri 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Sudha Nitu 6 years, 4 months ago
- 2 answers
Posted by Annaya Mishra Annaya Mishra 6 years, 4 months ago
- 5 answers
Posted by Kailash Sirvi 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Rytham Kapoor 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Hari Krishna 6 years, 4 months ago
- 2 answers
Lokanath Reddy 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Aslam Shaikh 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Reenu Kumari Reenu Khatri 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Sushant Ishi 6 years, 4 months ago
- 2 answers
Rytham Kapoor 6 years, 4 months ago
Sushant Ishi 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Hari Krishna 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 6 years, 4 months ago
1. The peasants condition improved and there was an improvement in agriculture.
2. It resulted in a political advantage to the English as the landlords who became the owners of the land became true supporters of the English government.
3. Permanent Settlement led to the modernisation of India in the sphere of revenue system.
4. The English government did not have to fix the revenue every year. The income of the government was fixed once for all.
5. A large number of employees were no longer needed for the revenue administration of the company and could devote their services to other departments of the company.
Posted by Vedansh Vedansh 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
- The conflict between the Bengal nawabs and the East India Company started when the Nawabs refused to grant the Company concessions and demanded large tributes for the Company,s right to trade.
- The Nawabs also denied the Company any right to mint coins, and stopped it from extending its fortifications.
- Accusing the company of deceit, the Nawabs claimed that the Company was depriving the Bengal government of huge amounts of revenue and undermining the authority of Nawab.
- It was refusing to pay taxes, writing disrespectful letters and trying to humiliate the Nawab and his officials.
- The Company also had its grievances against the Nawabs. It felt that the demands of the Nawabs were unfair and that their trade could flourish only if the duties were removed. The company wanted to enlarge its fortification and build forts. All this led to conflicts between the Bengal Nawabs and the Company.
Posted by Aarav Chauhan 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Reenu Kumari Reenu Khatri 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Kunal Shrinath 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
Britannia has been used in several different senses, but is best known as a national personification of the United Kingdom.
Posted by Aman Maurya 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
The metallic minerals are subclassified as :
- ferrous (iron, manganese, nickel, and cobalt)
- nonferrous (copper, zinc, lead, tin, and bauxite),
- precious (gold, silver, and platinum).
Posted by Vinay Dengi 6 years, 4 months ago
- 3 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
If an Indian ruler died without a male heir his kingdom would become the part of company territory.
Lokanath Reddy 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Vinay Dengi 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Aman Maurya 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Vinay Dengi 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
In May 1857, the East India Company faced a massive rebellion that threatened the company’s very presence in India. Sepoy’s mutinied in several places beginning from Meerut and people from different sections of society rose up in rebellion.
Posted by Neyma Mallick 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
Following are the objectives of the Constitution given in the Preamble:
- Justice-Social, political and economic.
- Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship.
- Equality of status and opportunity.
- Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the nation.
Posted by Harsh Lokhande 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 6 years, 4 months ago
Chandragupta II was Son of Samudragupta and his queen Dattadevi. Chandragupta II was also known as ‘Vikramaditya’.
Posted by Harsh Lokhande 6 years, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Sonam Singh 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Deep Jain 6 years, 4 months ago
Posted by Shriram Ram 6 years, 4 months ago
- 2 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
Intervene is to take part in something so as to prevent or alter a result or course of events.
Posted by Satendra Singh 6 years, 4 months ago
- 5 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
Hyder Ali was the Sultan and de facto ruler of the Kingdom of Mysore in southern India.
Lokanath Reddy 6 years, 4 months ago
Jadav Hardeep Jadav 6 years, 4 months ago
Jadav Hardeep Jadav 6 years, 4 months ago
Yogita Ingle 6 years, 4 months ago
Hyder Ali:
- Started his career as a soldier in the Mysore Army.
- Soon rose to prominence in the army owing to his military skills.
- He was made the Dalavayi (commander-in-chief), and later the Chief Minister of the Mysore state under Krishnaraja Wodeyar II, ruler of Mysore.
- Through his administrative prowess and military skills, he became the de-facto ruler of Mysore with the real king reduced to a titular head only.
- He set up a modern army and trained them along European lines.
Posted by Aarshi Lodh 6 years, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Nayan Soni 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Nayan Soni 6 years, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Shivam Tiwari 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 6 years, 4 months ago
The Battle of Plassey was fought between the forces of the Nawab of Bengal Siraj-ud-Daulah and the English East India Company, led by Robert Clive. It was fought on 23 June 1757 at Plassey near Murshidabad. A major portion of the 50,000 strong army of the Nawab was controlled by Mir Jafar who was hand in gloves with the British. His men did not join the battle at a crucial time. As a result, the Nawab’s men suffered heavy casualties and he himself left the battlefield after the death of his commander Mir Madan. This was a major blow to the Nawab’s army which was, as a result, easily defeated by the British. Later, the Nawab himself was caught and killed, and Mir Jafar was instituted as the new Nawab of Bengal.
Posted by Vaishali Gandhi 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
Indian secularism works in various ways to prevent religious domination:
(a) It uses a strategy of distancing itself from religion. The Indian State is not ruled by a religious group. It also does not support any one religion. In our country, government places like law courts police stations, government schools and offices are not supposed to demonstrate or promote any one religion.
(b) The second way in which Indian secularism works to prevent the domination of religion is through a strategy of non-interference. This means that in order to respect the sentiments of all religions and not interfere with religious practices, the State makes certain exceptions for particular religious communities. Just take the example of the Sikh community. For Sikhs, wearing a pagri is a very important part of their religion. The government cannot force them to wear a helmet while driving a two-wheeler.
(c) The third way in which Indian secularism works to prevent the domination of religion is through a strategy of intervention. Untouchability presents a good example where members of the same religion, i.e. upper caste Hindus, dominate other members, i.e. lower castes within it. In order to prevent this religion-based discrimination of lower castes, our Constitution banned untouchability. Here, the State intervened in religion in order to uproot a social practice that it believed discriminated and excluded, and that violated the Fundamental Rights of the people belonging to lower caste.
Posted by Aditya Agrawal 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 6 years, 4 months ago
The Battle of Buxar was fought in 1764 between the English East India Company and the combined armies of Mir Qasim (the nawab of Bengal), the nawab of Awadh and the mughal emperor Shah Alam II. The employees of the Company misused their trading privileges.
Posted by Pranav Kadam 6 years, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Sia ? 6 years, 4 months ago
1Thank You