In 1911, Rutherford performed the gold foil experiment. He bombarded a stream of a-particles on a gold foil, a thin sheet which was 0.00006 cm thick in an evacuated chamber. An a-particle is a positively charged helium ion (He +).
Most of the a-particles passed straight through the foil without any deflection. This concluded that most of the space inside of an atom is empty.
(ii) A few particles were deflected through small angle and few through larger angles. This happened due to positive charge on particles and core (nucleus) of the atom. The heavy positively charged 'core' was named as nucleus.
(ii) The number of particles which bounced back was very small. This concluded that the volume of the nucleus is very small in comparison to the total volume of the atom. On the basis of gold foil experiment, Rutherford concluded that an atom consists of nucleus which has positive charge and it is surrounded with electrons which are moving around the nucleus. The number of electrons and protons are equal and the entire mass of the atom is concentrated at its nucleus. Drawbacks in the Rutherford's model
(i) According to classical electro-magnetic theory, a moving charged particle, such as an electron under the influence of attractive force loses energy continuously in the form of radiations. As a result of this, electron should lose energy and therefore, should move in even smaller orbits ultimately falling into the nucleus. But the collapse does not occur. There is no explanation for this behavior.
(ii) Rutherford did not specify the number of orbits and the number of electrons in each orbit.
Gaurav Seth 3 years, 9 months ago
In 1911, Rutherford performed the gold foil experiment. He bombarded a stream of a-particles on a gold foil, a thin sheet which was 0.00006 cm thick in an evacuated chamber. An a-particle is a positively charged helium ion (He +).
Most of the a-particles passed straight through the foil without any deflection. This concluded that most of the space inside of an atom is empty.
(ii) A few particles were deflected through small angle and few through larger angles. This happened due to positive charge on particles and core (nucleus) of the atom. The heavy positively charged 'core' was named as nucleus.
(ii) The number of particles which bounced back was very small. This concluded that the volume of the nucleus is very small in comparison to the total volume of the atom. On the basis of gold foil experiment, Rutherford concluded that an atom consists of nucleus which has positive charge and it is surrounded with electrons which are moving around the nucleus. The number of electrons and protons are equal and the entire mass of the atom is concentrated at its nucleus. Drawbacks in the Rutherford's model
(i) According to classical electro-magnetic theory, a moving charged particle, such as an electron under the influence of attractive force loses energy continuously in the form of radiations. As a result of this, electron should lose energy and therefore, should move in even smaller orbits ultimately falling into the nucleus. But the collapse does not occur. There is no explanation for this behavior.
(ii) Rutherford did not specify the number of orbits and the number of electrons in each orbit.
0Thank You