Why integration of princely states became …
CBSE, JEE, NEET, CUET
Question Bank, Mock Tests, Exam Papers
NCERT Solutions, Sample Papers, Notes, Videos
Posted by Komal Meena 5 years, 3 months ago
- 1 answers
Related Questions
Posted by Reetu Chettri 1 year, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Hunmili Killingpih 1 year, 3 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Neha Nishad 1 year, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Prinjal Singh 1 year, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Navya Paul 1 year, 3 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Yogesh Godara 1 year, 3 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Thar Teen 1 year, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Abigail Golmei 1 year, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Jasleen Kaur Palak 1 year, 4 months ago
- 2 answers
Posted by Kulvir Dhillon 1 year, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Meghna Thapar 5 years, 3 months ago
The integration of the princely states raised the question of the future of the remaining colonial enclaves in India. The imprecise doctrine of paramountcy allowed the government of British India to interfere in the internal affairs of princely states individually or collectively and issue edicts that applied to all of India when it deemed it necessary. The Rajput princely state of Jodhpur was a strange case of tilting towards Pakistan despite having a Hindu king and a large Hindu population. The British ruled India with two administrative systems: British Provinces and Indian "princely" states; about 60% of the territory of the Indian sub-continent were provinces and 40% were princely states. The first step in this process, carried out between 1947 and 1949, was to merge the smaller states that were not seen by the Government of India to be viable administrative units either into neighbouring provinces, or with other princely states to create a "princely union".
1Thank You