The internet cannot replace a classroom …

It is true that internet cannot replace a classroom teacher because the internet can provide only information but teacher can interact with the students and answers depth problems of the students

good

I am writing this against the motion for internet can't replace a teacher

With iternet you can answer each and every types of questions no question are there which the internet can not answer and we just got a class of time interval 30-40 minutes in this less time how many student can clear their doubt in a class of 40 student only 10to 15 students can get the answers
So therefore we have to search our answers in internet it makes our life possible and in my thinking there is no bigger class student who didn't search their questions in internet .

It is true that internet cannot replace a classroom. I am writing this debate for the motion. The internet cannot and never ever replace a classroom teacher because 1.physical presence of teacher is always better than virtual presence of it.the child would learn faster in the presence of teacher 2.internet involves huge cost than to study in a school by a teacher 3. Use of internet would lead to irregular presence of child.likewise the child would not study regular.but as in the school thi child makes a habit of regularly going to it 4. The child will feel alone when he is studying through internet it is not so in the case of school as there are many students in the school By the way i really wanted to write the debate against the motion because i really feel that studying through internet is better.but as per the demand of the question.you can relate your answer with the above points