Ask questions which are clear, concise and easy to understand.
Ask QuestionPosted by Harshil Kumar 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Aman Choudhary 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Gaurav Seth 6 years, 9 months ago
John Marshall was the Director General of ASI from 1902 to 1928. In fact, John Marshall’s stint as Director-General of the ASI marked a major change in Indian archaeology. He was the first professional archaeologist to work in India, and brought his experience of working in Greece and Crete to the field. More importantly, though like Cunningham he too was interested in spectacular finds, he was equally keen to look for patterns of everyday life.
Before discussing John Marshall's work we should discuss the general picture of archaeology in India of that time. Most of the archaeologist prior to Marshall was of view that indian civilization started from 6th century BCE and there was this tendency to use written words to guide the archaeological digs. Thus when Cunnigham came across with Harappan artefacts he was not able to understand it and tried very hard to fit it within the time frame he was familiar with (6th - 4th century BCE).
It was much later when Daya Ram Sahni discovered seals which he found in the layer of soil which was way more older than the 6th century BCE. The information began to come and it was Rakhal Das Bannerji who discovered the similarities of the seals discovered from the various sites leading to the conjecture that these sites were part of a single archaeological culture. Based on these finds, in 1924, John Marshall, Director General of the ASI, announced the discovery of a new civilisation in the Indus valley to the world. It was then that the world knew not only of a new civilisation, but also of one contemporaneous with Mesopotamia.
However it was also during Marshall's stints as Director General that lots of context in which artefacts were discovered were lost becuase he ignored the stratigraphy of soil, the mistake which was noted by Wheeler ( next director general). Even then it was during his tenure that Indians were allowed to participate in excavations in their own country. And as S N Roy has said “Marshall left India three thousand years older than he had found her.”
Posted by Prithviraj Samajder 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Tarun Singh 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Sheikh Ahmed 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Sonamit Lepcha 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Ashish Chopra 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Pragya Tyagi 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Divas Tamang 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Pragya Tyagi 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Rohan Rai 6 years, 9 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Prince Rao 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Sayam Vats 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Yukta Sharma 6 years, 9 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Krishna Kr 6 years, 9 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Ashish Chopra 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 6 years, 9 months ago
kbar was a great and able ruler. He laid special emphasis on land revenue system. For this purpose he followed the policy initiated by Sher Shah Suri. But this policy had certain defects in it. That’s why Akbar began works from the start. Main features of his land revenue system are given below:
(i) Following policy initiated by Sher Shah : In the beginning, Akbar followed the policy of land revenue initiated by Sher Shah. During the reign of Sher Shah, average value was determined by measuring agricultural land. It was determined on the average production of produce. Later on Akbar felt that it needed a lot of time to fix market price. It was also a cause of worry for peasants. That’s why Akbar again started policy of yearly assumption.
Determination of Tax : Akbar followed following policies for fixing land revenue:
(a) Zabti System : This policy was the creation of Raja Todar Mal. Under this system of revenue, tax was fixed by measuring the land. This system was implemented in Gujarat, Lahore, Malwa, Allahabad etc.
(b) Ten Years System : This system was a developed form of Zabti system. According to this, average of last ten years of production of crops and their value was taken out. One third of that average produce was taken as revenue. This revenue could have been taken in the form of cash or produce.
(c) Batai or Galla Bakshi System: In this system whole of the total produce was divided in the definite proportion among peasant and the state. Honest officials were required for the success of this system.
(d) Nasak or Kankut System : Record of agriculture tax was kept in this system.
(ii) Measurement of Land : During the reign of Akbar, land was measured with a proper method. With this state the peasant came to know about how much they will have to pay and how much revenue will be collected for the state.
(iii) Keeping in mind the fertility of the soil : Fertility of the soil was always kept in mind while determining land revenue. That land was called as ‘Polaj’ which was cultivated every year and that land was called as ‘Parauti’ which was not cultivated every year. All in all tax was fixed on the basis of the fertility and the produce.
(v) Facilities of Peasants : Special facilities were also given to peasants in case of famine or drought. They were given certain facilities in paying taxes in case of natural calamity. They were also given loans for tools, implements and animals.
Posted by R B 6 years, 9 months ago
- 2 answers
R B 6 years, 9 months ago
Komal Ruhil 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by R B 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 6 years, 9 months ago
Vijayanagara was founded in 1336 AD. Its founders were two brothers called Harihara and Bukka Raya. They founded a city called Vijayanagara on the banks of river Tungabhadra. Gradually this city was transformed into a large Hindu Kingdom.
Posted by Piyush Shivasha 6 years, 9 months ago
- 2 answers
Tanya Chaudhary 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Dinem Ryee 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Ishika Anand 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Ankit Kumar 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Sresth Pandey 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Yash Paul 6 years, 9 months ago
- 2 answers
Pavneet Kaur 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Piyush Shivasha 6 years, 9 months ago
- 2 answers
Pavneet Kaur 6 years, 9 months ago
Pragya Tyagi 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Piyush Shivasha 6 years, 9 months ago
- 2 answers
Pavneet Kaur 6 years, 9 months ago
Pragya Tyagi 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Harsh Sharma 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Sayam Vats 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Keshav Gautam 6 years, 9 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Gaurav Kandpal 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Gaurav Seth 6 years, 9 months ago
(a) According to local tradition, temple halls sheltered the monkey kingdom of Vali and Sugriva mentioned in the Ramayana. Other traditions suggest that Pampadevi, the local mother goddess did penance in these halls in order to marry Virupaksha, the guardian diety of the kingdom, also recognised as a form of Shiva.
(b) Temple building in the region had a long history, going back to dynasties such as the Pallavas, Chalukyas, Hoysalas and Cholas. Rulers very often encouraged temple building as a means of associating themselves with the divine — often, the deity was explicity or implicity identified with the king. Temples also functioned as centres of learning.
(c) It is likely that the very choice of the site of Vijayanagara was inspired by the existence of the shrines of Virupaksha and Pampadevi. In fact the Vijayanagara kings claimed to rule on behalf of the god Virupaksha. All royal orders were signed “Shri Virupaksha”, usually in the Kannada script.
(d) In terms of temple architecture, by this period certain new features were in evidence. These included structures of immense scale that must have been a mark of imperial authority, best exemplified by the raya gopurams or royal gateways that often dwarfed the towers on the central shrines, and signalled the presence of the temple from a great distance. They were also probably meant as reminders of the power of kings, able to command the resources, techniques and skills needed to construct these towering gateways. Other distinctive features include mandapas or pavilions and long, pillared corridors that often ran around the shrines within the temple complex.
(e) The halls in the temple were used for a variety of purposes. Some were spaces in which the images of gods were placed to witness special programmes of music, dance, drama, etc. Others were used to celebrate the marriages of deities, and yet others were meant for the deities to swing in.
Posted by Karan Waraich 6 years, 9 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Anmol Kumar 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Aman Kapoor 6 years, 9 months ago
Posted by Shalini Sharma 6 years, 9 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Mallika Dvrma 6 years, 9 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Mallika Dvrma 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Aryaman Bhardwaj 6 years, 8 months ago
Posted by Mallika Dvrma 6 years, 9 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Jenbruno Gamer 6 years, 9 months ago
- 1 answers
Pragya Tyagi 6 years, 9 months ago

myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students

Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.

CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
myCBSEguide
Jeewika Kochar 6 years, 9 months ago
0Thank You