Ask questions which are clear, concise and easy to understand.
Ask QuestionPosted by Nagamma Gouuda 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Sefu Db 4 years, 2 months ago
- 3 answers
Anushka Singh 4 years, 2 months ago
Posted by Amoolya Nayak 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Naman1 Parvadiya 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Rishita Chauhan 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Shivam Chitte 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Anushka Singh 3 years, 7 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 3 years, 7 months ago
Little means something which is in very low amount. A little means something which is required in lesser amount than what the meaning little would have delivered.
- Little→not much (negative).
- A little→some (positive).
- The little→small amount but all that is there; followed by a Noun with that after it (explicitly stated or implied).
Posted by Anushka Singh 4 years, 2 months ago
- 2 answers
Gaurav Seth 4 years, 2 months ago
Verbs can be finite or non-finite. Finite verbs change their form when there is a change in the subject or the tense. Watch <a href="https://youtu.be/RZCvVIABFm4">this video for easy explanations of finite and non-finite verbs</a>. You can watch <a href="https://youtu.be/XvPc6LZUFT4">/a Malayalam version of the same video</a> here.
Study the examples given below.
- I work hard for my family.
The verb work becomes works when the subject is a singular noun/pronoun.
- Maya works hard for her family.
- He works hard for his family.
Work becomes worked when the sentence is in the past tense.
- I worked very hard yesterday.
- He worked very hard yesterday.
- Maya worked very hard yesterday.
Such verbs which change their form are called finite verbs.
Non-finite verbs do not change their form when there is a change in the number or person of the subject. Examples are: to-infinitives and –ing forms.
- I need a pen to write.
- He needs a pen to write.
- Rani needs a pen to write.
- Ravi needed a pen to write.
Here the verb need is finite because it has different forms (need, needs, needed) whereas the verb to write is non-finite.
More examples are given below.
- Supriya enjoys swimming.
- I enjoy swimming.
- Do you enjoy swimming?
- I enjoyed swimming when I was a child.
Enjoy is finite whereas swimming is non-finite.
Posted by Aarchi Mittal 4 years, 2 months ago
- 5 answers
Posted by Pintu Karsh 4 years, 2 months ago
- 5 answers
Chhaya Thakur 4 years, 2 months ago
Posted by Taneya Gupta 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Kevin Aji 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 4 years, 2 months ago
Restrictive Clause
A restrictive clause restricts or defines the meaning of a noun or noun phrase and provides necessary information about the noun in the sentence. It is not separated from the rest of the sentence by commas. Restrictive clauses are more common in writing than nonrestrictive clauses. A restrictive clause is also sometimes referred to as an essential clause or phrase.
Here are a few examples:
- The student who sits in the back of the room asks a lot of questions.
- The results that I obtained may invoke positive social change.
- The journalist whose story I read yesterday has won prizes for her work.
Nonrestrictive Clause
A nonrestrictive clause adds additional information to a sentence. It is usually a proper noun or a common noun that refers to a unique person, thing, or event. It uses commas to show that the information is additional. The commas almost act like parentheses within the sentence. If the information between the commas is omitted, readers will still understand the overall meaning of the sentence. A nonrestrictive clause is also known as a nonessential clause or phrase.
Here are a few examples:
- I want to thank my father, Mark Smith, for all of his love and support.
- With the nonrestrictive clause omitted: I want to thank my father for all of his love and support.
- The hypothesis, which I tested throughout the research, was rejected.
- With the nonrestrictive clause omitted: The hypothesis was rejected.
Posted by Ajay Kumar 4 years, 2 months ago
- 3 answers
Gaurav Seth 4 years, 2 months ago
The smell of leather is compared to the smell of incense in a church.
Posted by Vanshi Garg 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Yogita Ingle 4 years, 2 months ago
Maya thinks that Mr Nath is a crook because he doesn’t talk to anyone and has no friends. She believes that his scars are result of shoot-out with police.
He doesn’t work anywhere and sits at home all the day and there are no visitors at his place except the Sunday morning guest.
He is not bothered about his meals and pays the money in cash. She thinks that the Sunday visitor is his partner in the crime. He keeps the money from the loot and comes to give Mr Nath his share.
Posted by Ansh Dalal 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Gaurav Seth 4 years, 2 months ago
In Attila by R.K. Narayan we have the theme of trust, faith, loyalty, persuasion and luck. Taken from his Malgudi Days collection the story is narrated in the first person by an unnamed narrator and after reading the story the reader realises that Narayan may be exploring the theme of trust. Attila cannot be trusted as a guard dog. He is too friendly in his manner allowing anybody to enter the property he is supposed to be protecting. If anything Attila is more like a pet than a guard dog. However it is noticeable that one member of the family does always defend Attila while everybody else can only see the negative in Attila. It is the young defenders faith in Attila which ensures that he remains with the family despite the fact that he is in reality not a guard dog at all. It is also interesting that the young defender remains loyal to Attila even after the house has been robbed. He cannot see that Attila may be at fault such is his allegiance to Attila. If anything it would appear that Attila has only one friend in the house and that friend is the young defender. No matter what Attila may do or what mistakes he may make the young defender always defends Attila. Even when it is clear to the reader that Attila is not the dog that the young defender thinks he is.
What is also interesting about the story is the fact that the narrator never takes sides. They never comment as to whether Attila’s actions are good or bad. It is left to the reader to decide for themselves as to whether Attila is a suitable guard dog. The narrator remains unbiased throughout the story. It is as though they are relaying the facts to the reader and allowing the reader make up their own mind. In many ways this may be important as it draws the reader into the story encouraging them to make a decision based on the facts that are presented to them. If anything the narrator remains neutral throughout the story. Making sure not to tie themselves to any particular side. Be it with the family members who think that Attila is not a good guard dog to the young defender who is constantly taking Attila’s side. However it might be important to consider that for the majority of readers Attila would be viewed upon as no more than a pet rather than as a guard dog. At no stage in the story does Attila show an ability to defend the property he is supposed to defend.
Attila is also easily persuaded when Ranga is robbing the house. Rather than doing anything constructive Attila ends up following Ranga home to his house and becoming his friend. It does not enter Attila’s mind that his own family’s house has been robbed and that it was his role to defend the property and family from intrusion. Though some critics might suggest that Attila is fickle in nature and prepared to go off with anybody who treats him nicely. It is more likely that Attila simply isn’t a suitable guard dog. He may lack the required intelligence to protect his owner’s property. It is also interesting that Attila forces himself completely on Ranga. Whether he is working or at home Attila is constantly by Ranga’s side. Much to Ranga’s annoyance. Ranga has no option but to allow Attila remain by his side. There is nothing he can do when it comes to the loyalty that Attila shows him.
The end of the story is also interesting as Narayan may be introducing an element of luck. The young defender sees Attila in the streets and only by sheer chance does he realise that Ranga is the thief who stole the jewellery from his house. Rather than seeing events as being fortunate the young defender believes that Attila has been following Ranga all the time. Considering Attila to be a detective. While the reader realises that this is not the case. Attila has shown no loyalty to his previous family or to the young defender but the young defender cannot see this. He cannot see that what has happened is purely an act of good fortune. That he has been lucky while walking through the streets to see Attila. Whose first concern was not to run to the young defender but to follow Ranga as he was running away. Regardless of this the family’s faith in Attila as a guard dog is restored. Rather than viewing his as a pet who likes to have fun. Which he is. The family again bestow their trust in Attila. At the end of the story Attila can do no wrong. He is considered to be a hero by all concerned in the family and the young defender feels justified that he has stuck by Attila’s side when everybody else thought him to be a poor guard dog. In reality Attila has fooled everybody by way of good fortune rather than by his abilities as a guard dog.
Posted by Anmol 1713H 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Gaurav Seth 4 years, 2 months ago
Three things which we can learn from the 'tiny teacher' are hard work, sense of duty and discipline. An ant displays all these qualities We never see it sitting idle. Each does its share of work very sincerely and no one tries to disturb the other in its work.
Posted by Soni Parwani 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Satparkash Singh 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Ankit Raj Singh 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Amit Kumar 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Kandula Snehitha 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Khushi Yadav 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by G. Gokul 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by G. Gokul 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Sagar Sharma 3 years, 7 months ago
- 1 answers
Sia ? 3 years, 7 months ago
a sword used in former times, noted for the temper and elasticity of its blade.
Posted by Pavan Teja 4 years, 2 months ago
- 1 answers
Gaurav Seth 4 years, 2 months ago
In Answer to the first Question, the hermit said that there is only one time that is important and that time is ‘Now’. It is the only time when one has any power to act. The hermit Answered the second Question by saying that the most necessary person is the person you are with at a particular moment. This is because no one knows what will happen in the future and whether we will meet anyone else. The hermit’s response to the third Question was that the most important thing is to do good for the person one is with. This is because all are sent into this world for that purpose alone.
Posted by Ananya Lachyankar 4 years, 2 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Harmeet Singh 4 years, 2 months ago
- 5 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Anushka Dhakad 4 years, 2 months ago
0Thank You