What was the objective of Lord …
CBSE, JEE, NEET, CUET
Question Bank, Mock Tests, Exam Papers
NCERT Solutions, Sample Papers, Notes, Videos
Test
Related Questions
Posted by Arpita Rathore 1 year, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Jyoti Abhale 1 year, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Nandika Roy 1 year, 4 months ago
- 0 answers
Posted by Aryan Pawar 1 year, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Neeraj Kumar 1 year, 4 months ago
- 2 answers
Posted by Manju Thapa 1 year, 4 months ago
- 1 answers
Posted by Jyoti Abhale 1 year, 4 months ago
- 2 answers
myCBSEguide
Trusted by 1 Crore+ Students
Test Generator
Create papers online. It's FREE.
CUET Mock Tests
75,000+ questions to practice only on myCBSEguide app
Yogita Ingle 6 years, 5 months ago
In a subsidiary alliance, princely rulers were not allowed to make any negotiations and treaty with any other ruler. They were also not allowed to have an independent armed force. They were to be protected by the East India Company but had to pay for the subsidiary forces that the company was to maintain for protection. If Indian rulers failed to make the payment, part of their territory was taken away as penalty. For example, the Nawab (ruler) of Awadh was forced to give over half of his territory to the company in 1801, reason provided by British officer was Maladministration. Hyderabad was also forced to cede territories on similar grounds.
1Thank You